Archives for E. Pratt Whitney

Student Body Diversity Case To Be Decided By Eight Caucasians and A Black Guy

WASHINGTON D.C. ~ On Wednesday, six Catholics and three Jews will consider a challenge to the use of diversity in undergraduate admissions at the University of Texas in Austin. The nine justices all hold degrees from either Harvard or Yale. Seven are in long-term opposite sex relationships.

  • Justice Thomas was appointed by President George W. Bush after a search committee concluded him to be “the nation’s first and only reliably conservative black guy.”

  • In appointing Justice Kagan, President Obama hit what experts call “The Diversity Trifecta;” a Jewish woman who openly prefers “basketball” to “exercise class.”

  • Sandra Day O’Connor, the nation’s first female Supreme Court Justice, was nominated by Ronald Reagan, thereby fulfilling a campaign promise to “get a woman — any woman — on the court.” Today the retired O’Connor has a site devoted in part to the Bill of Rights, a document that — effective with the release of Citizens United — the court no longer considers important when crafting opinions.

198 of the 200 ABA accredited law schools are unrepresented on the Supreme Court, including every law school situated in the Central, Mountain or Pacific time zones.

Argument is ironically scheduled twenty-nine months to the day after the Court officially closed its doors to the public; the ones that say “Equal Justice Under Law” above the door.

Federal Judge Tacitly Reveals Life Under The Homeland Battlefield Provision


“It is a sad reality that in the ten years since the first detainees were brought to Guantanamo Bay not a single one has been fully tried or convicted of any crime. Despite this, the Government has fought to deny detainees the ability to challenge their indefinite detentions through habeas proceedings.” ~U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth

168 Muslims sit behind bars in Cuba. The courts have cleared more than 50% for immediate release. Yet, there they sit.

Every day for the past 11 years — over repeated objections of two presidents and their attendant party faithful — Muslim prisoners have been knocking on the Federal courthouse door, thereby indirectly laboring to ensure that your Bill of Rights remains intact.

They call them “detainees” because “prisoners” have rights. We call that “good lawyering.”

On September 18, 2001, President Bush signed a law authorizing the individual who happens to be president to kill citizens of the United States with Hellfire Missiles. The law does this by placing no limits on what a president can do once he yells: “Terrorist!”

Given the unlimited authority Congress handed presidents, it should come as no surprise that today the President actually kills citizens with Hellfire Missiles, and that he reserves the right — under the same law — to do the same on U.S. soil.

It should come as no surprise that one of these presidential missiles incinerated a 16 year old boy from Denver. It should come as no surprise that no speaker at either convention mentioned the name: Abdulrahman Awlaki. It should come as no surprise that when a reporter cornered the President in Ohio on Thursday and was like: “WTF with assassinating citizens?!” (paraphrasing) — the President lied.

It doesn’t get anymore transparent than that.

The President doesn’t want you to know that:

  • he can kill you
  • he can fit you with an ankle bracelet
  • he doesn’t want you to know — Gun Nut Alert — that he can take your guns
  • he can order the Secretary of the Treasury to freeze your assets
  • his defense lawyer is in Federal court in New York likening you — an innocent citizen — to a Nazi.

But, this is the President we’re going to have until January 2017, so I’m going to be writing about for the benefit of the nation’s two or three remaining civil libertarians.

Politicians like their citizens stupid. They like you like Todd Akin likes his women — helpless. They want you reciting the Lord’s Prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance; not the First Amendment. They don’t want you to know that a subset of the 1,000 or so Federal judges scattered across America, actually await the opportunity to push the Reset Button.

The Homeland Battlefield Provision is what you get when you look to politicians for the love you never had from your father. But, when you’re that needy — that co-dependent — it should come as no surprise when Daddy no longer guarantees you a grand jury or an indictment or a lawyer or Miranda or a judge or a trial or discovery or cross-examination or privacy or property rights.

That’s how is was in the United Stats from 1776-1791. No Bill of Rights. Those were fifteen bad years. And, that’s exactly where we are today. The President can apply the Bill of Rights, or not. In other words, no rule of law.

The New York Times really got its pen out today:

“Judge Lambert is completely right in his insistence that the administration respect the rule of law.”

I am so moved.

It would have been nice for the Times to mention Abdulrahman Awlaki in the 7,000 word brochure it published advertising the President’s Assassination Program. See, Secret Kill List Tests Obama’s Principles.

It’s about shaping your relationship with war, so that you never question the fact that war — in this case, the final war — is on you. If this is not the tipping point to awaken the citizenry — and it doesn’t seem to be — grab the SPAM, head for the hills and put a fork in the so-called “American Experiment.”

Against the foregoing absurd backdrop Chris Hedges is fighting back.

Earlier this year, Hedges filed a lawsuit against the United States, for the purpose of nullifying the Homeland Battlefield Provision of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, which specifically authorizes presidents to perpetually detain citizens of the United States — without trial — just like we do the Muslims in Guantanamo.

GTMO is nothing but a beta-site for U.S. citizens, and that’s all it’s ever been.

In Hedges, Benjamin Torrance, the President’s defense lawyer, has gone out of his way to ensure the court that while citizens may well be detained not “indefinitely,” but “perpetually,” under military authority, they are guaranteed access to habeas review.

Not “indefinite,” but “perpetual.” Isn’t that clever? Mr. and Mrs. Torrance must be so proud.

What the President’s lawyer never reveals, is that it his client who decides the terms and conditions under which you have access to legal advice, thereby reducing to zero the chance that any habeas review will be meaningful, even under the kangaroo rules governing military tribunals.

Now you know why they don’t have cameras in Federal courts. (What they really need are showers.)

Quick backstory: In 1995, I was released from Federal prison — no — not for stabbing an anonymous commenter.

When I was 28 — 25 years ago — I gave the bank a couple of tax returns that were not what they appeared to be and the judge gave me a three year timeout. I can’t say for sure whether I am the first citizen to serve time when his payments were current. All I can say is that I’ve been reading law for 25 years and it is possible.

Today I actually own my very own copy of the law, which I rent to the lawyers. God bless them, every one!

As a broke, bankrupt, high school graduate with a young family on welfare — representing myself — instead of doing 1,600 days as the Government proposed at sentencing, I won a couple of appeals and ended up serving 700 days on the installment plan; 15 months in, two years out pending further litigation (because, “yes” my original sentence was that unconstitutional) and then six months back in to serve what I like to call “the balance due.”

In all, I did time in five Federal prisons, including maximum security, due to a clerical error by the people in shipping and receiving.

Instead of working out in the gym, I worked out in the law library. Upon release, I had the opportunity to collaborate with F. Lee Bailey in a bank fraud case involving a functionally, illiterate defrocked bank president with an eighth grade education.

You need a license to cut hair. Turns out, any asshole can be a bank president.

The probation officer predictably forbid me to work on Federal criminal cases, even under the supervision of real attorneys and I filed suit. The judge did not issue the injunction as requested. However, from the bench, he told the United States to leave me alone and that was that.

Even with the protection of the Bill of Rights, it is a lifestyle choice to not plead guilty and do battle with the DOJ; largest law firm in the world. U.S. citizens amount to 5% of the world’s population. But, when aggregated, the 50 states and the Feds house 25% of the world’s prisoners. That’s still not lopsided enough for the Risk Management Industrial Complex.

The United States has unfortunately chosen to close ranks on the citizenry. If there is a less conspiratorial language to describe the situation, I am all ears. It is a fact, that three days after 9-11 your representatives permanently collapsed the legislative branch into the executive branch. Three days after 9-11 the vote was 518-1 to authorize presidents to kill you with a missile or whatever.

On New Year’s Eve, President Obama signed a law that says he can throw you in jail for up to — and including — forever without trial. The vote in the senate was 93-7, and in a total absence of any pretense, they called it “The Homeland Battlefield Provision.”

Doesn’t get anymore transparent than that.

The occasional willing judge is the only thing that stands between the citizenry and the strong executive presidents to become. On Thursday, Judge Lambert ripped into the President, noting that your First Amendment right to “access the courts means nothing without access to counsel.”

Duh.

Chris Hedges also found a willing judge, by the name of Katherine Forrest (an Obama appointee), who in May issued a preliminary injunction against the President, barring enforcement of the Homeland Battlefield Provision. The President’s response to the preliminary injunction is that he can lock you up anyway, under the 9.18 law he uses to kill citizens with missiles. His lawyer says the impact of the injunction on the actions of the President is “nil.”

And, he’s right — for now.

Every law is constitutional — no matter how unconstitutional — until a judge says otherwise. This is why every citizen and organization who directly relies on the First Amendment for their living — every preacher, every artist, every reporter, every author, every lawyer — needs to bury the Department of Justice with lawsuits of the sort Chris Hedges filed when he became the first citizen to attempt to end the Homeland Battlefield Provision, and of the sort I filed last year, when I became the first — and only — citizen to sue the United States for the purpose of ending our nation’s unconstitutional participation in the Libyan Civil War.

The only thing the politicians fear is a willing judge. Go find one. It’s change you can believe in.